Architect.new vs Cursor — Compare AI Tools | TryAnAI

Architect.new vs Cursor

Side-by-side comparison based on pricing, features, and community data.

Architect.new vs Cursor — quick answer

Architect.new and Cursor are both AI coding tools. Architect.new is Freemium; Cursor is Freemium. These tools serve fundamentally different audiences.

Architect.new pricing:: Freemium
Cursor pricing:: Freemium
Category:: Coding

Which should you choose?

These tools serve fundamentally different audiences. Architect.new targets non-technical users and business stakeholders who want to describe an idea and get a working application without touching code. Cursor targets developers who already write code and want AI to accelerate their workflow. Architect promises faster time-to-concept for non-coders but carries risks around code quality and customization for complex requirements. Cursor requires coding knowledge but delivers codebase-aware assistance, multiple AI models, and familiar VS Code ergonomics. Choose Architect if you're building internal tools without a dev team; choose Cursor if you're a developer wanting smarter autocomplete and refactoring.

Pick Architect.new if

Pick Architect.new if you're a non-technical founder or business user who needs to prototype applications quickly without hiring developers.

Pick Cursor if

Pick Cursor if you're a software developer who wants AI-assisted code writing with full codebase understanding and control over your development environment.

Feature-by-feature

Feature	Architect.new	Cursor
Primary user type	Non-coders, business users	Professional developers
Codebase context awareness	—	✓ Full codebase chat & search
AI model choice	Proprietary (fixed)	✓ GPT-4, Claude, multiple options
Code customization control	Limited fine-grained control	✓ Full editor control
Output type	Full working apps + architectural plans	Code snippets & refactoring assistance
Integration ecosystem	—	✓ GitHub, GitLab, VS Code extensions
Offline capability	Web-only	Partial (desktop, limited offline)