AI email writing and reply generation using context from received emailsWorks in any text field across any website via browser extensionSupport for 20+ languagesGrammar and tone correctionContext-aware response generationOne-click reply drafting in GmailCustom instructions for personalized writing style
Features
Grammar and language error detectionPlagiarism detection and originality checkingAcademic writing tone and clarity suggestionsCitation format verification and managementDiscipline-specific writing recommendationsParaphrase suggestions for improved clarityPerformance metrics and writing analytics
Pricing Tiers
Pricing Tiers
Free$0/mo/monthly
Limited AI generations per week
Premium/monthly
Unlimited generations, priority access
Pricing Tiers—
Integrations
Integrations
GmailGoogle DocsLinkedInTwitter/XFacebookAny web-based text field (via Chrome extension)
Integrations
Microsoft WordGoogle DocsOverleafMendeleyZoteroEndNote
Platforms
Platforms
chrome-extension
Platforms
webchrome-extension
Pros
Pros
Works across any website text field, not limited to a single platform
Deep Gmail integration reads email context to generate accurate replies
Supports 20+ languages for multilingual users
No need to leave the current tab — drafts appear inline
Free tier available for light use without a credit card
Pros
Trained on millions of published academic papers for discipline-specific recommendations
Real-time plagiarism detection integrated into the writing interface
Citation format checking and integration with major reference managers
Specifically designed for academic language and research conventions
Available as integrations in MS Word, Google Docs, and Overleaf for seamless workflow
Cons
Cons
Limited to Chrome (and Chromium-based) browsers — no Firefox or Safari support
No standalone web app or mobile app; entirely extension-dependent
Free tier has generation limits that can be restrictive for daily heavy use
Less suitable for long-form content like blog posts or reports
Output quality depends heavily on the prompt/context provided by the user
Cons
Subscription required for most advanced features; limited free tier
Plagiarism detection may have false positives on standard academic phrases
Suggestions sometimes overly conservative, preferring formal tone over modern academic writing
Limited support for non-English language papers despite global researcher audience
No integration with some niche reference management tools or institutional writing platforms