AI email writing and reply generation using context from received emailsWorks in any text field across any website via browser extensionSupport for 20+ languagesGrammar and tone correctionContext-aware response generationOne-click reply drafting in GmailCustom instructions for personalized writing style
Features
Asynchronous video recording with time limits and retake optionsAI-powered candidate response analysis and scoringCustomizable question templates by role and departmentCandidate ranking and comparison dashboardInterview recording and transcript generationCollaborative feedback from multiple stakeholdersATS integration via API
Pricing Tiers
Pricing Tiers
Free$0/mo/monthly
Limited AI generations per week
Premium/monthly
Unlimited generations, priority access
Pricing Tiers—
Integrations
Integrations
GmailGoogle DocsLinkedInTwitter/XFacebookAny web-based text field (via Chrome extension)
Integrations
WorkdayGreenhouseLeveriCIMSCustom APIZapier
Platforms
Platforms
chrome-extension
Platforms
webiosandroid
Pros
Pros
Works across any website text field, not limited to a single platform
Deep Gmail integration reads email context to generate accurate replies
Supports 20+ languages for multilingual users
No need to leave the current tab — drafts appear inline
Free tier available for light use without a credit card
Pros
Eliminates scheduling friction with asynchronous interviews candidates complete on their own time
AI analysis of responses saves hiring managers from watching hours of video
Reduces interviewer bias through standardized questions and objective AI scoring
Customizable questions and evaluation criteria per job role
Interview data and candidate rankings exported for ATS integration
Cons
Cons
Limited to Chrome (and Chromium-based) browsers — no Firefox or Safari support
No standalone web app or mobile app; entirely extension-dependent
Free tier has generation limits that can be restrictive for daily heavy use
Less suitable for long-form content like blog posts or reports
Output quality depends heavily on the prompt/context provided by the user
Cons
Candidates may feel less connection compared to live interviews, potentially affecting experience
AI evaluation quality depends heavily on question clarity and context
Limited to video—no live interview capability if hiring teams want follow-up conversations
Integration with major ATS platforms is API-based, requiring technical setup
Transparent methodology around AI scoring may raise concerns among privacy-conscious organizations